My post on utopian science was a little bit hasty and poorly thought out, but it did motivate Robin Hanson to further explain some of his own ideas on academic prediction markets, so I’m counting it as a victory.
Norwegian founders with an international team on a mission to offer the equivalent of a Norwegian social safety net globally available as a membership. Currently offering travel medical insurance for nomads, and global health insurance for remote teams.
B4X is a free and open source developer tool that allows users to write apps for Android, iOS, and more.
Dr. Laura Baur is a psychiatrist with interests in literature review, reproductive psychiatry, and relational psychotherapy; see her website for more. Note that due to conflict of interest she doesn't treat people in the NYC rationalist social scene.
MealSquares is a "nutritionally complete" food that contains a balanced diet worth of nutrients in a few tasty easily measurable units. Think Soylent, except zero preparation, made with natural ingredients, and looks/tastes a lot like an ordinary scone.
Jane Street is a quantitative trading firm with a focus on technology and collaborative problem solving. We're always hiring talented programmers, traders, and researchers and have internships and fulltime positions in New York, London, and Hong Kong. No background in finance required.
Metaculus is a platform for generating crowd-sourced predictions about the future, especially science and technology. If you're interested in testing yourself and contributing to their project, check out their questions page
Support Slate Star Codex on Patreon. I have a day job and SSC gets free hosting, so don't feel pressured to contribute. But extra cash helps pay for contest prizes, meetup expenses, and me spending extra time blogging instead of working.
Substack is a blogging site that helps writers earn money and readers discover articles they'll like.
The COVID-19 Forecasting Project at the University of Oxford is making advanced pandemic simulations of 150+ countries available to the public, and also offer pro-bono forecasting services to decision-makers.
Altruisto is a browser extension so that when you shop online, a portion of the money you pay goes to effective charities (no extra cost to you). Just install an extension and when you buy something, people in poverty will get medicines, bed nets, or financial aid.
AISafety.com hosts a Skype reading group Wednesdays at 19:45 UTC, reading new and old articles on different aspects of AI Safety. We start with a presentation of a summary of the article, and then discuss in a friendly atmosphere.
Giving What We Can is a charitable movement promoting giving some of your money to the developing world or other worthy causes. If you're interested in this, consider taking their Pledge as a formal and public declaration of intent.
The Effective Altruism newsletter provides monthly updates on the highest-impact ways to do good and help others.
Beeminder's an evidence-based willpower augmention tool that collects quantifiable data about your life, then helps you organize it into commitment mechanisms so you can keep resolutions. They've also got a blog about what they're doing here
Seattle Anxiety Specialists are a therapy practice helping people overcome anxiety and related mental health issues (eg GAD, OCD, PTSD) through evidence based interventions and self-exploration. Check out their free anti-anxiety guide here
.
80,000 Hours researches different problems and professions to help you figure out how to do as much good as possible. Their free career guide show you how to choose a career that's fulfilling and maximises your contribution to solving the world's most pressing problems.
you count that as a victory? are you serious?
Relative to the goal of moving the discussion forward and advancing thought about the problem, rather than defeating any particular opponent, that’s a clear victory.
Arguing with yourself is a lot better than arguing with spam.
Suppose you just observed someone debating prediction markets with Andrew Nanospray, the Turing-positive Indonesian spambot. What is your posterior on the hypothesis that you are living not merely in a simulation, but in an actual William Gibson novel?
Sounds more Stephenson to me.
Wow, I didn’t notice that was a spambot. Guess the best way to imitate humanity is to be a rude jerk.
This blog gets a very high grade of spambots. Unusually high, even.
Most of the spam on this blog is very ordinary: vague praise or specific questions about blogging, but not specific to the post. The ads for spellcasters aren’t ordinary, but they’re obviously spam. The best spam I’ve seen is copied from other blogs discussing the same topic. If it is a link, this can be done automatically. Since this blog is mainly not links, the strategy does not apply. I don’t know what algorithm generated this particular entry, but until I see a pattern, I am not impressed.
I thought it might be a spambot, but I figured it couldn’t be because it knew I was talking about counting things as victories.
I only just realized the algorithm could be to look for the last clause, grammatically rearrange it, and ask if it was serious. If so, nicely done.
I think I might have to start a Spambot Hall Of Fame for this blog.
This wasn’t a very large update to my “I live in a godawful cyberpunk novel” hypothesis, but my belief was already quite high on that hypothesis.
Even simpler: look for posts containing common statements like “I’m counting it as a victory” and post prewritten responses.
Heh, point.
Still I think it’s odd that everyone in this thread is assuming a dichotomy between “Contributing Human” and “Spamming Bot”. My leading hypothesis right now is “Spamming Human”. The response is very specific to the post, and might very well be a genuine criticism. I’d be fairly surprised if this were a bot. Regarding Scott’s suggestion that it’s rephrasing the last sentence as a question, ELIZA-style, and adding “Seriously?”, I’d say that’s unlikely:
“I’m counting it as a victory.” becomes “You’re counting it as a victory?”, not “You count that as a victory?”. That kind of dynamic contextual rephrasing, changing tense and swapping ‘it’ for ‘that’, is well beyond the kind of thing I’d expect from a bot.
Edit: The idea intrigues me though, I will probably form a mental habit of taking the last sentence of every blog post I read, converting the last sentence to a question and adding “seriously?”, and keep track of whether that sounds like a real comment. Assumptions about Gricean Maxims might do most of the heavy lifting.
It’s tricky, but doable inside a couple thousand lines of code (plus however much you want to put into handling irregular verbs). The game I work on in my free time does that sort of thing routinely to make action text grammatically correct across observers.
The only part that looks nonstandard to me is swapping “it” for “that”, and that might just be a general rule that swaps out the noun phrase in subject place — which in this case happens to be “it”.
Wow that was strange. I just wrote an extremely long
comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear.
Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again.
Anyway, just wanted to say fantastic blog!
Most of my evidence suggests you aren’t a real person. For any real people reading this, though, I would suggest the Lazarus browser extension for Chrome or Firefox. It saves the contents of forms (locally, not to the cloud) so that you can recover longbreplies even if your original post gets eaten.
Neat, I’d never heard of that extension.
I guess sufficiently advanced spam is indistinguishable from a useful contribution.
Links to the extension “Lazarus: Form Recovery”:
the Firefox add-on
its website, with versions for Chrome and Safari too