<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Art Of Writing Randian Monologues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/</link>
	<description>In a mad world, all blogging is psychiatry blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:57:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-136870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-136870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, you can detect introversion vs. extroversion in the cradle.

Present a stimulus.  The baby that reacts more weakly, or not at all, is going to be the extrovert because apparently the root cause of it is insensitivity.

I doubt babies are trying to be insensitive in the cradle and failing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you can detect introversion vs. extroversion in the cradle.</p>
<p>Present a stimulus.  The baby that reacts more weakly, or not at all, is going to be the extrovert because apparently the root cause of it is insensitivity.</p>
<p>I doubt babies are trying to be insensitive in the cradle and failing.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '136870', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin F</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-116031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 04:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-116031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '116031', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-116027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 04:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-116027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The link &quot;my own blog&quot; is an index of his blog, with a section of posts on show and tell. Technically, the answer to your question may be &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fimfiction.net/user/Bad+Horse&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link &#8220;my own blog&#8221; is an index of his blog, with a section of posts on show and tell. Technically, the answer to your question may be <a href="https://www.fimfiction.net/user/Bad+Horse" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '116027', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin F</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-116012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 04:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-116012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’ve written several blogs just on the dangers of “Show, Don’t Tell”,&quot;

What is the URL for your blog? I would love to read those articles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ve written several blogs just on the dangers of “Show, Don’t Tell”,&#8221;</p>
<p>What is the URL for your blog? I would love to read those articles.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '116012', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Goetz</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-115658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Goetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-115658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the right answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the right answer.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '115658', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Goetz</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-115653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Goetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-115653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;How not to write a novel&lt;/i&gt; contains only very basic advice. Its objective is to make slushpile reading slightly less painful. If you learn anything from it, you aren&#039;t ready to write a novel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How not to write a novel</i> contains only very basic advice. Its objective is to make slushpile reading slightly less painful. If you learn anything from it, you aren&#8217;t ready to write a novel.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '115653', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Goetz</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-115648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Goetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-115648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, thank goodness. I thought you meant Gertrude Stein&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books/about/How_to_Write.html?id=NMxO-GzKyacC&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;book on writing&lt;/a&gt;. It begins like this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Qu&#039;est-ce que c&#039;est cette comedie d&#039;un chien. Que le dit train est bien celui qui doit les conduire a leur destination. Manifestement eveille.
When he will see
When he will see
When he will see the land of liberty.
The scene changes it is a stone high up against with a hill and there is and above where they will have time. Not higher up below is a ruin which is a castle and there will be a color above it. Painting now after its great moment must come back to be a minor art.
Will be welcome.
We will be welcome.
Should be put upon a hill. Across which it is placed upon different hills. Lower hills have a mark they mean.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thank goodness. I thought you meant Gertrude Stein&#8217;s <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/How_to_Write.html?id=NMxO-GzKyacC" rel="nofollow">book on writing</a>. It begins like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Qu&#8217;est-ce que c&#8217;est cette comedie d&#8217;un chien. Que le dit train est bien celui qui doit les conduire a leur destination. Manifestement eveille.<br />
When he will see<br />
When he will see<br />
When he will see the land of liberty.<br />
The scene changes it is a stone high up against with a hill and there is and above where they will have time. Not higher up below is a ruin which is a castle and there will be a color above it. Painting now after its great moment must come back to be a minor art.<br />
Will be welcome.<br />
We will be welcome.<br />
Should be put upon a hill. Across which it is placed upon different hills. Lower hills have a mark they mean.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '115648', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Goetz</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-115592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Goetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-115592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right; transitions between different structural elements are very difficult, and seldom talked about. It&#039;s hard to pick up on you own, because done well, it&#039;s invisible. Jack Bickham focuses on concrete issues like this. He&#039;s published many books on writing; &lt;i&gt;Scene and Structure&lt;/i&gt; is pretty good. But see my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/128281/writing-jack-bickham-my-strange-hero&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;warning on Jack Bickham&lt;/a&gt;. Unlike most people reading his advice, I&#039;ve read his fiction. He was a bad writer who mastered the craft of writing, but had no art. His advice is always double-edged. Advice from Hollywood writers, like &lt;I&gt;Writing Movies for Fun and Profit&lt;/i&gt;, usually falls into this same category of being simple, formulaic, and effective, but only at producing stories that tell people what they want to hear rather than get them to think. Stories that reinforce our beliefs are more emotionally powerful than stories that question them. It&#039;s the difference between resonance and destructive interference. When someone says a story resonates with her, that&#039;s a literal explanation of what it does: It gives a series of emotional pulses that are in sync with the reader&#039;s natural responses. This is why cultural touchstones like &lt;i&gt;Lord of the Rings&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Star Wars&lt;/i&gt; always have strong elements of pop philosophy (whether liberal or conservative), and why Jack Bickham&#039;s book &lt;i&gt;The 38 Most Common Fiction Writing Mistakes&lt;/i&gt; is simultaneously a formula for success, and a method of guaranteeing that nothing you write will ever be great.

What is a good book on writing for you depends on what you want to write and where you are as a writer. For people who haven&#039;t been published yet, Writer&#039;s Digest produces all sorts of books and a magazine  with useful advice, most of which eventually becomes dangerous. I&#039;ve written several blogs just on the dangers of &quot;Show, Don&#039;t Tell&quot;, advice that originated with Aristotle, was discarded by Shakespeare, scorned by 19th-century English novelists, rediscovered by realists and modernists, and is now the single most-frequently given piece of writing advice. Going through good books and highlighting clauses that show in one color and clauses that tell in another reveals that the best novels use lots of telling. &quot;Show, don&#039;t tell&quot; is actually suited only to a few kinds of stories, typically hyper-realistic (Flaubert, Proust) or hyper-masculine (Elmore Leonard), and especially the combination of the two (Hemingway).

Good books on the craft of writing include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/335947/the-writers-notebook-craft-essays-from-tin-house&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Writer&#039;s Notebook: Craft essays from Tin House&lt;/a&gt;, James Frey&#039;s books, and Francine Prose&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Reading Like a Writer&lt;/i&gt;. Bad sources include Ursula Le Guin&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Steering the Craft&lt;/i&gt; and the Teaching Company lecture series &lt;i&gt;Building Great Sentences&lt;/i&gt;,  both of which advocate grammatically awkward sentences. The books by Stephen King, James Gardner, &amp; Ray Bradbury all have good reputations, but it&#039;s been so long since I read them that I have no idea what&#039;s in them. The podcast series &quot;Writing Excuses&quot; is popular with SF+F writers, though personally I find they have a low baud rate. John August + Craig Mazin&#039;s podcast, &quot;ScriptNotes&quot;, is sometimes great (their &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-ep-73-raiders-of-the-lost-ark-transcript&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;podcast analyzing Raiders of the Lost Ark&lt;/a&gt; is one of the best explanations of story I&#039;ve heard), but it&#039;s diluted with talk on contractual matters and career advice for Hollywood.

I remember thinking that Stanislavski&#039;s books on acting had good advice for writers, but I haven&#039;t read them in 15 years and so have no memory of them.

When a piece of writing advice becomes troublesome, go through several books that you love with a highlighter and determine whether they follow that advice. The most commonly given advice is often the worst, because it is directed at the most common type of writer, which is the beginner. &quot;Eliminate adverbs and adjectives&quot; is another piece of advice that is good for beginners but bad for good writers.

There&#039;s a middle ground between craft and art that is untouched. I know because this is my weak area. You&#039;ll find little actionable advice on pacing or on emotional escalation, perhaps because they are analog rather than discrete in nature. Any useful discussion of them would have to quantify their components, and writers don&#039;t quantify.

Books for writers who have the craft well in hand are very different, and rare. Craft is knowing how to do something; art is deciding what to do. Books on the art of writing  are less like lessons and more like discussions, on theme and literary theory. Good books in this category include E.M. Forster&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://ell.ibu.edu.ba/assets/userfiles/ell/Aspects%20of%20the%20Novel.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aspects of the Novel&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paris Reviews interviews&lt;/a&gt; with authors. I also recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/331277/bad-horse-blog-index&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my own blog&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m not convinced that reading a good book about writing will help your writing more than will reading a good book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right; transitions between different structural elements are very difficult, and seldom talked about. It&#8217;s hard to pick up on you own, because done well, it&#8217;s invisible. Jack Bickham focuses on concrete issues like this. He&#8217;s published many books on writing; <i>Scene and Structure</i> is pretty good. But see my <a href="http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/128281/writing-jack-bickham-my-strange-hero" rel="nofollow">warning on Jack Bickham</a>. Unlike most people reading his advice, I&#8217;ve read his fiction. He was a bad writer who mastered the craft of writing, but had no art. His advice is always double-edged. Advice from Hollywood writers, like <i>Writing Movies for Fun and Profit</i>, usually falls into this same category of being simple, formulaic, and effective, but only at producing stories that tell people what they want to hear rather than get them to think. Stories that reinforce our beliefs are more emotionally powerful than stories that question them. It&#8217;s the difference between resonance and destructive interference. When someone says a story resonates with her, that&#8217;s a literal explanation of what it does: It gives a series of emotional pulses that are in sync with the reader&#8217;s natural responses. This is why cultural touchstones like <i>Lord of the Rings</i> and <i>Star Wars</i> always have strong elements of pop philosophy (whether liberal or conservative), and why Jack Bickham&#8217;s book <i>The 38 Most Common Fiction Writing Mistakes</i> is simultaneously a formula for success, and a method of guaranteeing that nothing you write will ever be great.</p>
<p>What is a good book on writing for you depends on what you want to write and where you are as a writer. For people who haven&#8217;t been published yet, Writer&#8217;s Digest produces all sorts of books and a magazine  with useful advice, most of which eventually becomes dangerous. I&#8217;ve written several blogs just on the dangers of &#8220;Show, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;, advice that originated with Aristotle, was discarded by Shakespeare, scorned by 19th-century English novelists, rediscovered by realists and modernists, and is now the single most-frequently given piece of writing advice. Going through good books and highlighting clauses that show in one color and clauses that tell in another reveals that the best novels use lots of telling. &#8220;Show, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; is actually suited only to a few kinds of stories, typically hyper-realistic (Flaubert, Proust) or hyper-masculine (Elmore Leonard), and especially the combination of the two (Hemingway).</p>
<p>Good books on the craft of writing include <a href="http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/335947/the-writers-notebook-craft-essays-from-tin-house" rel="nofollow">The Writer&#8217;s Notebook: Craft essays from Tin House</a>, James Frey&#8217;s books, and Francine Prose&#8217;s <i>Reading Like a Writer</i>. Bad sources include Ursula Le Guin&#8217;s <i>Steering the Craft</i> and the Teaching Company lecture series <i>Building Great Sentences</i>,  both of which advocate grammatically awkward sentences. The books by Stephen King, James Gardner, &amp; Ray Bradbury all have good reputations, but it&#8217;s been so long since I read them that I have no idea what&#8217;s in them. The podcast series &#8220;Writing Excuses&#8221; is popular with SF+F writers, though personally I find they have a low baud rate. John August + Craig Mazin&#8217;s podcast, &#8220;ScriptNotes&#8221;, is sometimes great (their <a href="http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-ep-73-raiders-of-the-lost-ark-transcript" rel="nofollow">podcast analyzing Raiders of the Lost Ark</a> is one of the best explanations of story I&#8217;ve heard), but it&#8217;s diluted with talk on contractual matters and career advice for Hollywood.</p>
<p>I remember thinking that Stanislavski&#8217;s books on acting had good advice for writers, but I haven&#8217;t read them in 15 years and so have no memory of them.</p>
<p>When a piece of writing advice becomes troublesome, go through several books that you love with a highlighter and determine whether they follow that advice. The most commonly given advice is often the worst, because it is directed at the most common type of writer, which is the beginner. &#8220;Eliminate adverbs and adjectives&#8221; is another piece of advice that is good for beginners but bad for good writers.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a middle ground between craft and art that is untouched. I know because this is my weak area. You&#8217;ll find little actionable advice on pacing or on emotional escalation, perhaps because they are analog rather than discrete in nature. Any useful discussion of them would have to quantify their components, and writers don&#8217;t quantify.</p>
<p>Books for writers who have the craft well in hand are very different, and rare. Craft is knowing how to do something; art is deciding what to do. Books on the art of writing  are less like lessons and more like discussions, on theme and literary theory. Good books in this category include E.M. Forster&#8217;s <a href="http://ell.ibu.edu.ba/assets/userfiles/ell/Aspects%20of%20the%20Novel.pdf" rel="nofollow">Aspects of the Novel</a>, and the <a href="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews" rel="nofollow">Paris Reviews interviews</a> with authors. I also recommend <a href="http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/331277/bad-horse-blog-index" rel="nofollow">my own blog</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that reading a good book about writing will help your writing more than will reading a good book.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '115592', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavendar bubble tea</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-109579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavendar bubble tea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-109579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Or if I’m writing Lord of the Rings, I don’t want to know how to write the climactic scene at Mount Doom, I want to know how to get Frodo through two thousand miles of swamps without just writing “And then he walked through another five hundred miles of swamps, it was very wet and icky and there were probably fights with giant bug monsters” four times.&quot;

Not sure if this is helpful, but I find that the narration style of the Project Gutenberg translation of &quot;Dreams of the Red Chamber&quot; to have a really interesting style of narration for impersonal events. The writing style seems to be heavily centered around external actions. This is my first time reading one of the four great classics of Chinese literature but I am finding that there is a really cool massive contrast between Dreams of the Red Chamber and pretty much anything else I ever read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Or if I’m writing Lord of the Rings, I don’t want to know how to write the climactic scene at Mount Doom, I want to know how to get Frodo through two thousand miles of swamps without just writing “And then he walked through another five hundred miles of swamps, it was very wet and icky and there were probably fights with giant bug monsters” four times.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure if this is helpful, but I find that the narration style of the Project Gutenberg translation of &#8220;Dreams of the Red Chamber&#8221; to have a really interesting style of narration for impersonal events. The writing style seems to be heavily centered around external actions. This is my first time reading one of the four great classics of Chinese literature but I am finding that there is a really cool massive contrast between Dreams of the Red Chamber and pretty much anything else I ever read.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '109579', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/21/the-art-of-writing-randian-monologues/#comment-108369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slatestarcodex.com/?p=2285#comment-108369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;how to have characters go outside without something very abrupt and boring like “And then he went outside”.

Focus on something relevant to the story, and weave the transition into it.

&quot;His doubts didn&#039;t leave him as he stepped outside. Nor did they weaken during the long bus ride home, instead growing with each passing street-light. By the time he was standing at his own front door, he was almost determined to ditch the whole thing. But his dirt-smudged hallway, his half-repaired windows, and his drenched mattresses, familiar yet depressing sights, all urged him to reconsider.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;how to have characters go outside without something very abrupt and boring like “And then he went outside”.</p>
<p>Focus on something relevant to the story, and weave the transition into it.</p>
<p>&#8220;His doubts didn&#8217;t leave him as he stepped outside. Nor did they weaken during the long bus ride home, instead growing with each passing street-light. By the time he was standing at his own front door, he was almost determined to ditch the whole thing. But his dirt-smudged hallway, his half-repaired windows, and his drenched mattresses, familiar yet depressing sights, all urged him to reconsider.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="report_comments_flag(this, '108369', '3412210cfd')" class="report-comment">Report comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
